I wrote a few days ago about comparing the alpha trak and pet test advocate meters
Alpha trak. Pet test
1/7.11:06p. 398 399
1/8. 10:35a.125. 138
10:40p.194. 214
1/9.10:30 a.173. 238
10:22p.216. 240
1/10.11:16a.209. 209
11:01p.263. 182
1/14.10:50p.265. 295
1/15.10:59a.250. 471 ?
10:49p.143. 452 ?
I rechecked the pet test machine with the coding solution and it had been in range
When I first started but now it is over 200 higher than the high number. I just ran out
Of intro test strips so I don't think I am going to make the switch after these last 2 big
Differences. Is there any reason this should happen? Could they have had 2 different
Batches of strips in the vial? They don't code so why would that make a difference?
If you are using this as your only test machine please be careful if the number seems
Odd.
Alpha trak. Pet test
1/7.11:06p. 398 399
1/8. 10:35a.125. 138
10:40p.194. 214
1/9.10:30 a.173. 238
10:22p.216. 240
1/10.11:16a.209. 209
11:01p.263. 182
1/14.10:50p.265. 295
1/15.10:59a.250. 471 ?
10:49p.143. 452 ?
I rechecked the pet test machine with the coding solution and it had been in range
When I first started but now it is over 200 higher than the high number. I just ran out
Of intro test strips so I don't think I am going to make the switch after these last 2 big
Differences. Is there any reason this should happen? Could they have had 2 different
Batches of strips in the vial? They don't code so why would that make a difference?
If you are using this as your only test machine please be careful if the number seems
Odd.
Comment